FORWIT calls for strong commitment to R&I in Austria following EU decision

EU rejection of further cuts to research and innovation for 2025 sends a landmark signal to the coalition negotiating parties.

FORWIT welcomes the fact that the Member States have obviously recognised the seriousness of the situation and are following the recommendations of the Draghi and Letta reports by clearly rejecting further cuts to the Horizon Europe budget. While the European Council for Finance and Economy planned cuts of more than €400 million to the Framework Programme for 2025, the European Parliament successfully convinced the Member States not to agree to this proposal. After €2.1 billion of the 2021-2027 Horizon Europe budget was recently cancelled and allocated to other purposes, the rejection of a further reduction is a landmark signal for the governments of the EU member states.

FORWIT calls on the negotiating parties to follow the European example

We call on the negotiating parties to follow the example at European level and stand up for Austria as a strong centre of research and innovation.
Helga Nowotny

This signal must now also be seen in the coalition negotiations that have begun, says Council member Helga Nowotny. ‘We call on the negotiating parties to follow the example set at European level and to stand up for a strong research and innovation centre in the interests of Austria’s future prosperity and global competitiveness,’ Nowotny appeals. This also means distinguishing between expenditure and investment in view of the expected austerity measures.

After all, promoting research and innovation is an investment in the future – every euro invested demonstrably creates up to six euros in added value. Against the background of their dwindling competitiveness and global relevance – particularly in view of the ever-increasing need to catch up with the USA and China – Austria and Europe cannot afford to make savings in the very areas that hold the key to their future.

ECOFIN: Planned cuts to Horizon Europe must not be approved

ECOFIN wants to cut a further €400 million; calculations show that every euro invested in research contributes up to eleven euros to EU GDP.

While Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, the reports by Letta, Draghi and most recently by the Heitor Group focus on research and innovation as the key levers for strengthening European competitiveness, the European Council for ‘Finance and Economy’ (ECOFIN Council) is planning to significantly reduce the budget of the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (Horizon Europe) for 2025.

After recently cancelling €2.1 billion of the 2021-2027 Horizon Europe budget and allocating it to other purposes, the finance and economy ministers of the member states want to withdraw a further €400 million for 2025. Among other things, the funds of the European Research Council (ERC) are to be cut by €70 million and those of the Industrial Partnerships and the European Innovation Council (EIC) by around €40 million each.

Research funding is an investment in the future

“We see this as a significant contradiction. On the one hand, all those involved have recognised that research and innovation are the key to significantly strengthening Europe’s dwindling competitiveness and global importance – especially in view of the ever-increasing need to catch up with the USA and China. On the other hand, if the Member States have their way, further cuts are to be made in this critical area of all areas,” said Council member Helga Nowotny, expressing her irritation. It should not be the case that the Member States use the funds from the framework programme to plug financial holes elsewhere — and at the expense of a globally competitive, sustainable Europe.

Any reduction in research funding is detrimental to Europe’s prosperity, growth and competitiveness in the long term.
Helga Nowotny

FORWIT therefore appeals to the federal government to refrain from agreeing to further budget cuts in the current framework programme. “Every cut in research funding is detrimental to Europe’s prosperity, growth and competitiveness in the long term. Research funding is an investment in the future,” emphasises Nowotny.

€429 billion added value through Horizon Europe 2020

Macroeconomic calculations based on the European Commission’s NEMESIS model show the enormous contribution that European research and innovation funding makes to the countries of the EU: The investments of the last Horizon 2020 framework programme led to an average annual increase in EU GDP of € 15.9 billion. Extrapolated up to 2040, this effect amounts to up to €429 billion. The cost-benefit ratio or multiplier therefore implies that every euro invested generates around five – in the confidence interval even up to eleven – euros in added value.

Data Access Act: more ambition and speed are needed

The Council calls for decisive and forward-looking implementation. The public sector should set an example.

In a statement, the Council for Sciences, Technology, and Innovation (FORWIT) calls for the digital transformation as well as the use and secure sharing of data for the common good to be driven forward with determination. ‘An efficient data ecosystem that uses modern technologies to protect privacy is just as essential for a forward-looking social policy as it is for our innovative strength and competitiveness,’ emphasises Council Chairman Thomas Henzinger.

An efficient data ecosystem is just as essential for a forward-looking social policy as it is for our innovative strength and competitiveness.
Thomas Henzinger

The recently published data strategy for Austria and the draft law accompanying the Data Governance Act (DGA) mark the start of the necessary transformation process, which is overdue under EU law, and its consistent implementation must now follow quickly – as the DGA already came into force in September 2023.

Consider requirements in coalition negotiations

With the act, the EU created essential legal foundations for a transparent and efficient data ecosystem. From the Council’s point of view, the draft of the national accompanying law presented contains the necessary regulations for implementing the DGA and thus represents a legal prerequisite for fulfilling the EU obligations, Henzinger states. ‘However, we criticise the fact that the draft law only fulfils the minimum requirements. We see a clear need for ambition, speed and consideration of new technologies.’

The creation of a functioning and secure data ecosystem requires decisive measures and the political will to quickly establish the necessary structural and technological prerequisites – including an authority equipped with state-of-the-art infrastructure and expertise and clearly defined responsibilities. FORWIT strongly advises that these requirements be taken into account in the upcoming coalition negotiations.

Public sector should act as a role model

The aim should be for the public sector to act as a role model.
Helga Nowotny

At the same time, FORWIT points out that the resources provided give little hope that the public sector can take on a leading and exemplary role in building a data ecosystem that meets the requirements. ‘If the public sector takes on an exemplary role, it will make a decisive contribution to creating trust in the use of data, shaping it in a way that is oriented towards the common good and promoting research and innovation through legal and organisational standards – this should be the goal that needs to be achieved now,’ concludes Council member Helga Nowotny.

European research funding is set to change

In view of current discussions in Brussels, FORWIT is calling on the Austrian government to play an active role in shaping European research and innovation policy.

A report published yesterday by the expert group on the interim evaluation of the ‘Horizon Europe’ research framework programme provides new material for discussion in the shaping of European research and innovation policy. The so-called Heitor Report confirms the relevance and effectiveness of the framework programme for research and innovation in Europe. At the same time, it calls for necessary reforms. ‘I see many sensible proposals for the further development of the framework programme in the Heitor report,’ says Helga Nowotny, member of the Council for Research, Science, Innovation and Technology Development (FORWIT).

I see many sensible proposals for the further development of the framework programme in the Heitor report.
Helga Nowotny

However, the report comes at a time when rumours of fundamental changes to the EU budget are intensifying, which could also have an impact on research and innovation policy. ‘It is positive that Ursula von der Leyen has recognised the seriousness of the situation in which Europe finds itself. The project of European integration needs more focus, more decision-making power,’ says Thomas Henzinger, Chairman of FORWIT. However: ‘The EU’s research and innovation policy instruments work comparatively well. They must not become collateral damage in the planned reforms.’

Possible effects on cutting-edge research

Specifically, the European Commission is allegedly planning to create a central Competitiveness Fund, which would give it more room for manoeuvre in decision-making. ‘In our view, transferring the Framework Programme, or at least parts of it, together with many other programmes into such a fund does not do sufficient justice to the central importance of research and innovation,’ says Council member Helga Nowotny. Such an integration could be to the detriment of excellent research and development – not least because it is currently unclear how a ‘policy-orientated’ budget allocation should take place.

If the ERC were to be integrated into a competitiveness fund, European funding for cutting-edge research would no longer be researcher-driven, but policy-driven.
Thomas Henzinger

In the worst case scenario, for example, the European Research Council (ERC) would be integrated into such a fund. ‘The success of the ERC is largely due to its independence. It has created an important space that enables excellent basic research driven by researchers. If the ERC were to be integrated into a competitiveness fund, not only would its independence be lost, but European funding for cutting-edge research would no longer be researcher-driven, but policy-driven,’ warns Henzinger.

Building on Austria’s strengths in corporate research

The programmes of the so-called second pillar of the Framework Programme, which includes the area of cooperative, supranational applied research, are also currently the subject of much discussion. Austrian companies and research organisations are particularly successful in these programme lines. Nowotny calls for a rethink – regardless of how research funding will be organised in the future. ‘We have to move away from thinking that it’s all about getting as much money as possible back from Brussels. Instead, we should learn to make the best possible use of the European research programme – to strengthen the Austrian STI strategy in a European and global context,’ says Nowotny. This means strengthening those fields of cooperative research in which Austria is a leader through European networking and coordination, thereby making an effective contribution to Europe as an STI location.

Austria must play an active role in the debate

Austrian research organisations and companies must prepare for change. ‘The design and governance structure of the next framework programme are not yet foreseeable. It is therefore all the more important that the next federal government, together with the ministries concerned, closely monitors developments and actively and constructively contributes to the European debate,’ appeals Henzinger, who also sees the key organisations and players in the Austrian STI landscape as being called upon to get involved.

European research funding is a cornerstone of Austria’s and Europe’s global competitiveness.
Thomas Henzinger

In line with its mandate, FORWIT will also continue to make its contribution and make its expertise available to the federal government. ‘European research funding is a cornerstone of Austria’s and Europe’s global competitiveness. This is why FORWIT recently spoke out in favour of increasing the next multi-year European research budget to €200 billion,’ concludes Henzinger.

About the Heitor Report

In December 2023, the European Commission commissioned an expert group to carry out an interim evaluation of the European research funding programme Horizon Europe. Chaired by Manuel Heitor, the group brings together fifteen recognised experts from across the EU to provide valuable advice on the state of research and innovation in the EU. Among the members are the President of the Austrian Academy of Sciences Heinz Faßmann and the Vice Chair of FORWIT and innovation expert Sylvia Schwaag Serger. On 16 October 2024, the group published its report on the interim evaluation of the Horizon Europe programme.

AI: What the next Government must do

FORWIT and the AI Advisory Board recommend concrete measures to create the necessary framework conditions for the optimal development and utilisation of AI technologies.

 

In view of the increasing speed and dynamism with which new artificial intelligence technologies are developing and penetrating all areas of life, the Austrian Council for Sciences, Innovation, and Technology (FORWIT) and the Advisory Board for Artificial Intelligence are jointly making urgent recommendations to the next federal government.

The national implementation of the AI Act must be standardised and targeted across Europe—i.e. without excessive restrictions.
Thomas Henzinger, FORWIT

Although the EU’s Artificial Intelligence Act, which came into force in August, regulates the legal and regulatory framework, how the individual member states implement it is decided at national level—and this could lead to very different regulations. ‘We consider it extremely important for Europe as a centre of research and business that national implementation is carried out in a uniform and targeted manner across Europe—i.e. without excessive restrictions,’ appeals Thomas Henzinger, Chairman of FORWIT.

‘It will be the urgent task of the next federal government to create the framework conditions in this country that are necessary for the optimal development and utilisation of AI technologies—also in a European context,’ explains Horst Bischof, Chairman of the Advisory Board for Artificial Intelligence.

Measures to strengthen Austria’s capabilities and international position

The two bodies set out how these framework conditions can be shaped in the joint recommendation. In their view, there are seven specific measures that are necessary to equip Austria for the challenges and maximise the benefits within the European network:

  1. Revise the current AI strategy, taking into account new technological developments, and draw up a concrete implementation plan
  2. Creation of a separate State Secretariat for Digitalisation with sufficient capacities
  3. Establishment of an independent national competence centre for artificial intelligence
  4. Implementation of the Austrian data strategy using the latest technologies and solutions such as cryptography and differential privacy
  5. Participation in all European AI initiatives and positioning Austria as a key player
  6. Creating an attractive environment that motivates globally active AI companies to establish research and development hubs in Austria.
  7. Strengthening social trust in new technologies and addressing opportunities and risks in a balanced manner

Making Austria an AI-competent nation

We must treat the major opportunities on an equal footing with the risks.
Horst Bischof, AI Advisory Board

According to Henzinger, the fact that Europe and Austria have little presence in the development and design of AI and that none of the leading companies come from Europe is an alarm signal. ‘If we want to change this and make Austria and Europe an attractive, competent and future-proof AI location, we need to act quickly now and create the conditions for this.’

For Bischof, this also includes treating the immense opportunities of AI on an equal footing with the risks. ‘This is essential, not least in terms of social trust in these technologies. This requires technical understanding among the population as well as the expertise to use them.’

FORWIT welcomes new national data strategy

Implementation should take into account the latest technological processes and evolve with the state of research.

With the ministerial draft of a Data Access Act (DZG), which was submitted to the National Council on 2 October and includes accompanying regulations to the EU Data Governance Act, the federal government also published its data strategy. ‘The Austrian Council for Research, Science, Innovation and Technology Development (FORWIT) welcomes the fact that the federal government has adopted a national data strategy after long delays. However, FORWIT is pushing for implementation that is based on the latest available technologies and is constantly evolving with them,’ says Thomas Henzinger, Chairman of the Council.

Kryptografie und Differential Privacy vereinbaren Datenoffenheit mit Datenschutz

In the view of the expert panel, such technologies include cryptographic processes and differential privacy methods that make it possible to reconcile data openness with the protection of privacy. This is important for sensitive information – such as health data – but applies equally to all applications that utilise large amounts of data, such as in artificial intelligence.

‘If we make data accessible effectively and responsibly, this not only promotes science and innovation, it also provides the evidence for sustainable, effective political decisions and measures,’ emphasises Henzinger.

Forschung, Technologie und Innovation sind Garanten für Wohlstand und Sicherheit

Zwei Wochen vor der Nationalratswahl spricht der FORWIT Empfehlungen für die FTI- und Wissenschaftspolitik der nächsten Bundesregierung aus.

In der kommenden Legislaturperiode müssen erfolgreich begonnene Anstrengungen zur Stärkung der Leistungsfähigkeit des österreichischen FTI-Systems fortgeführt und intensiviert werden, um das System vorausschauend und konsequent weiterzuentwickeln. Das hält der Rat für Forschung, Wissenschaft, Innovation und Technologieentwicklung (FORWIT) in seiner Empfehlung fest.

Wie alle Länder ist Österreich mit globalen Entwicklungen und Herausforderungen konfrontiert, deren Bewältigung eine hohe systemische Anpassungsfähigkeit erfordern. Um gesellschaftlich und wirtschaftlich resilient zu sein, und agil und rasch auf neue Herausforderungen reagieren zu können, spielen Forschung, Technologie und Innovation eine entscheidende Rolle. Sie sind unerlässlich, um Freiheit, sozialen Frieden und Wohlstand langfristig zu sichern.

Resilienz, Agilität und Anpassungsfähigkeit deutlich steigern

Wenn jetzt nicht mutige Verbesserungen angegangen werden, fallen Österreich und Europa zurück.

Thomas Henzinger

„Im europäischen Vergleich ist Österreichs Position in Forschung, Wissenschaft und Innovation befriedigend, aber aus globaler Sicht zeigt sich ein dramatisches Bild. Wenn jetzt nicht mutige Verbesserungen angegangen werden, fallen Österreich und Europa zurück“, warnt Thomas Henzinger, Vorsitzender des FORWIT. „Ziel muss es sein, die Resilienz, Agilität und Anpassungsfähigkeit des Systems zu erhöhen, um effektiv mit unvorhersehbaren Herausforderungen und Krisen umgehen zu können“, so Henzinger.

Daher hat der Rat heute umfassende Empfehlungen für die FTI- und Wissenschaftspolitik einer Bundesregierung in der XXVIII. Legislaturperiode vorgelegt. Darin werden zwölf Handlungsfelder thematisiert, die der FORWIT als besonders dringlich erachtet, und Maßnahmen vorgeschlagen, die dazu beitragen können, diese Bereiche wirksam zu gestalten.

Innovationsdruck von vier Seiten

Österreich steht vor vier großen globalen Herausforderungen, die durch Forschung und Innovation gemeistert werden können: die neuen digitalen Technologien – allen voran Künstliche Intelligenz–, die Transformation zur Nachhaltigkeit, die volatile äußere Sicherheitslage sowie das fragile gesellschaftliche Vertrauen in Wissenschaft und Demokratie. Um diesen disruptiven Entwicklungen gezielt und effektiv begegnen zu können, braucht es eine Stärkung des österreichischen FTI-Systems.

Gelingen kann dies etwa durch die Gründung eines nationalen Kompetenzzentrums für Künstliche Intelligenz, das Österreichs „KI-Literacy“ befördert. Modellhafte Zero-Emission-Transformationszonen können als rechtliche „Sandboxes“ den regulatorischen Freiraum schaffen, innovative klimaverträgliche Technologien unter realen Bedingungen zu testen. Außerdem empfiehlt der FORWIT den Aufbau einer schlagkräftigen Behörde für Foreign Interference und hybride Bedrohungen sowie die Einrichtung integrierter Wissenschafts- und Demokratielabore („Future Labs“) in jedem Bundesland.

Voraussetzungen für erfolgreiche Forschung und Innovation

Um Forschung, Wissenschaft und Innovation in Österreich erfolgreich zu fördern, muss Österreich eine chancengerechte und moderne Bildung sicherstellen und sich zu einer Drehscheibe für globale Fachkräfte entwickelt. Nicht zuletzt muss verstärkt privates Kapital für Forschung und Innovation mobilisiert werden, um ein zukunftsfähiges FTI-System zu gewährleisten.

Die Empfehlungen des FORWIT schlagen dazu unter anderem ein durchgehendes Pflichtfach Informatik, die Einrichtung eines „Austria College“ für talentierte Studierende aus Drittländern und einen Dachfonds zur Erhöhung der Risikokapitalintensität, die insbesondere für Start-ups und die Skalierung von Unternehmen von hoher Relevanz ist, vor.

Vier Ziele für eine Erneuerung des FTI-Systems

Um die Effektivität von Wissenschaft und Forschung in Österreich zu steigern, benötigt das FTI-System eine gezielte Diskussion darüber, wie es sich erneuern kann. Aus Sicht des Rates gehören dazu die Ziele, dass die Regelstudiendauer an Hochschulen zum Normalfall und ein international kompatibles Karrieremodell für das Hochschulpersonal auch tatsächlich gelebt werden. Die Finanzierung von Forschung und Innovation soll unter dem Gesichtspunkt der Autonomie für Forschungsförderer und -träger organisiert werden. Zugleich gilt es, leistungsabhängige Anreize innerhalb der Forschungsfinanzierung weiter auszubauen.

Europas und Österreichs globale Relevanz schrumpft

Die nächste Bundesregierung sollte nicht nur klar für einen starken FTI-Standort Österreich, sondern auch für einen starken FTI-Standort Europa eintreten.

Sylvia Schwaag Serger

Die Empfehlungen des FORWIT richten sich zwar an die nächste Bundesregierung Österreichs, können aber ohne Europa nicht gedacht werden. „Wir sehen, dass die Bedeutung Europas – und damit auch Österreichs – auf globaler Ebene abnimmt. Wirtschaftlich und technologisch verliert die EU zunehmend an Relevanz und ihr Anteil an der globalen Forschungs- und Innovationslandschaft schrumpft. Daher sollte die nächste Bundesregierung nicht nur klar für einen starken FTI-Standort Österreich eintreten, sondern auch für einen starken FTI-Standort Europa – und sich aktiv in dessen Gestaltung einbringen“, appelliert die stellvertretende Ratsvorsitzende Sylvia Schwaag Serger.

FP10 sets the course for Europe’s global relevance

FORWIT makes recommendations for the design of the European Union’s tenth European Research Framework Programme (FP10).

 

The preparatory discussions for the European Union’s tenth research framework programme (FP10), which will replace the current Horizon Europe programme in 2028 and is expected to run until 2034, are now in full swing. The FP10 budget is to be discussed as early as summer 2025 as part of the negotiations on the EU’s next multiannual financial framework.

„For strategic reasons alone, it makes sense for the Federal Government to advocate a strong framework programme. Firstly, it is the area in which Austria raises significantly more funds than it contributes to the budget. Secondly, investment in research and development will determine how well Europe masters current and future challenges and transformation processes,“ says Thomas Henzinger, Chairman of FORWIT.

For strategic reasons alone, it makes sense for the federal government to advocate a strong framework programme.

Thomas Henzinger

Against this backdrop, FORWIT has spent the past few months working intensively on the question of which criteria can be used to ensure a future-oriented design of FP10. To this end, 23 stakeholder organisations were invited to contribute their perspectives. Today, the Council published the results of its work in a recommendation, which is intended to serve the Austrian federal government and the relevant federal ministries as an informed basis for the upcoming negotiations on FP10.

Increase permeability and strengthen strategically relevant value chains

From FORWIT’s point of view, strengthening the permeability between basic and applied research as well as between the individual sectors and nation states is essential for the success of FP10. This creates synergies that increase the effectiveness and efficiency of European research.

This would also help to strengthen strategically relevant value chains and promote the sovereign (further) development of key technologies. Other aspects addressed in the recommendation include defence research, the development of the European Research Area (ERA) and the future of European competitiveness.

Investing in the future of Europe

This is the only way to ensure Europe’s competitiveness vis-à-vis the USA and China.

Helga Nowotny

With regard to the financial endowment, FORWIT supports the call for FP10 to be given a budget of €200 billion. „This is the only way to guarantee Europe’s competitiveness against the USA and China,“ emphasised Council member Helga Nowotny, adding that the budget must be secured for the entire duration exclusively for the defined objectives of FP10 and must not be used for other priorities.

„Research funding is an investment in the future of Europe, in its global competitiveness and in the prosperity and security of our society. It is therefore particularly important that Austria brings an ambitious position to the negotiations on FP 10. FORWIT offers its expertise and accompanying advice for this purpose,“ emphasises Thomas Henzinger.

Future Fund Austria should be continued

Application volume exceeds €200 million for the first time, fund expires in 2025, FORWIT issues statement in favour of continuation

The Austrian Council for Sciences, Technology, and Innovation (FORWIT) is using its recommendation for the utilisation of funds from the Future Fund Austria (FZÖ) for 2024 as an opportunity to initiate a discussion on the continuation of this important funding instrument.

It is necessary to secure the future of the fund.

Thomas Henzinger

The FZÖ has secured an annual funding budget of €140 million for the years 2022 to 2025. Whether and how the fund will be continued beyond this, however, is currently unclear. „It is necessary to secure the future of the fund,“ says Thomas Henzinger, Chairman of FORWIT. The Council offers to contribute its expertise to the further development of the FZÖ.

Empfehlung zur Verwendung der Mittel 2024

FORWIT has completed its assessment of the 2024 funding allocation and submitted its recommendation to the National Foundation for Research, Technology and Development.

This year’s submissions focused, among other things, on the expansion of research infrastructures, lighthouse projects to achieve EU missions and increased participation in transnational research projects in EU partnerships. The support of highly qualified doctoral candidates and postdocs addresses excellent scientific training, and the promotion of equal opportunity collaborations aims at the sustainable development of gender equality. Other projects aim to stimulate innovative spin-off or start-up activities, promote prototypes or bring new technologies such as quantum communication to industrial realisation or commercial exploitation.

In total, the eligible funding organisations submitted 23 applications with a volume of €201 million—an increase of 11% compared to the previous year. Following a thorough evaluation of the applications, the Council recommends distributing funding totalling €17.5m to the aws, €15m to the CDG, €48.5m to the FFG, €42.5m to the FWF, €8m to the LBG and €8.5m to the ÖAW. Full details and reasons for the recommended use of funds can be found in the FORWIT recommendation.

Erhöhung der Fördermittel nach 2025 und Neujustierung des Fonds

The Council is in favour of continuing the Future Fund Austria after 2025 in any case. Funding of €200 million per year is to be made available for the period 2026 to 2030 in order to better utilise the potential of innovative research and technology development. “The fund is an important research policy instrument for Austria as a centre of research. However, its continuation should also be used to adjust this instrument in a new and sustainable way,” emphasises Thomas Henzinger. For an effective, targeted use of funds, programme lines that have proven their worth should be spun off from the FZÖ and the basic funding of the funding organisations concerned should be increased accordingly.

This is the only way to free up funds to react to current developments and invest in the next innovative research projects.

Sylvia Schwaag Serger

“It is to be welcomed if FZÖ-funded research projects develop into permanent programmes as a result of their success. However, they must then be withdrawn from the fund. This is the only way to free up resources to react to current developments and invest in the next innovative research projects,” explains Sylvia Schwaag Serger, Deputy Chairwoman. Conversely, Schwaag Serger adds that the appropriate framework conditions are also needed to ensure that programme lines that have not proven themselves or that have reached their objectives after a few years are no longer continued. This allows the fund to continue to focus on new funding programmes so that the STI system can be constantly renewed quickly and unbureaucratically.

“The fund increases the agility and flexibility of Austrian research funding and is therefore a complementary funding instrument to the multi-year STI pacts,” emphasises Henzinger. Wenn das verloren geht, würde es sich langfristig negativ auf die Innovationsfähigkeit – und damit auch auf Wettbewerbsfähigkeit und Wohlstand – des Standorts Österreich auswirken.

Sylvia Schwaag Serger new President of the Royal Swedish IVA

The Academy promotes engineering and economics and supports business and industry for the benefit of society.

On Monday evening, the Royal Swedish Academy of Engineering Sciences (IVA) announced that the vice chair of FORWIT, Sylvia Schwaag Serger, has been elected as the new president.

According to Thomas Henzinger, Chairman of the Council for Research, Science, Innovation and Technology Development (FORWIT), her election confirms Sylvia Schwaag Serger as an internationally renowned transformation and innovation expert. “Like FORWIT, the Royal Swedish Academy of Engineering Sciences will also benefit greatly from her extensive experience and proven expertise. On behalf of the entire Council, I warmly congratulate Sylvia Schwaag Serger on her appointment.”

On behalf of the entire Council, I would like to congratulate Sylvia Schwaag Serger on her appointment.

Thomas Henzinger, Chair

Sylvia Schwaag Serger is Chair of the Swedish Formas Research Council, member of the Swedish AI Commission and member of the expert group for the evaluation of Horizon Europe. From 2018 to 2021, she was Deputy Rector of Lund University and previously Head of International Cooperation at the Swedish innovation agency Vinnova. She was appointed as a China and innovation expert by the European Commission, the OECD and the World Bank and was a member of Prime Minister Stefan Löfven’s National Innovation Council and the Research Committee.

From 2015 to 2023, Sylvia Schwaag Serger was a member of the Austrian Council for Research and Technology Development (RFTE), most recently its Chair woman. Since November 2023, she has been the Deputy Chair of the successor organisation FORWIT, the Austrian Council for Sciences, Technology, and Innovation.

Sylvia Schwaag Serger will take office on 1 October 2024, making her the tenth President since the IVA was founded in 1919.